A Hidden Gut-to-Brain Dopamine Signal May Explain Why We Learn to Love Bitter Coffee

The first sip of black coffee is often a shock, yet millions of people end up looking forward to it every morning. Scientists at the University of California, San Francisco, say they have found part of the reason: a slow-acting dopamine pathway that runs between the digestive system and the brain and teaches us which flavors are worth liking.

The work, published Nov. 4 in the journal Nature and summarized by ScienceDaily, was done mostly in mice, with supporting evidence from brain scans of people. It suggests the brain learns to enjoy a taste after the body has already absorbed what the food delivers.

Two kinds of dopamine signals

Dopamine is a chemical messenger tied to motivation, reward and learning. Most earlier research has looked at its fast signals, which appear within seconds of something rewarding, such as the sight of a favorite meal.

The new study focuses on a slower system. According to the researchers, it responds to information coming from inside the body and lets the brain learn about the benefits of food after it has been eaten. Zachary Knight, a professor of physiology and the senior author, said this process largely happens outside our conscious awareness.

When food reaches the digestive tract, specialized sensors detect nutrients such as sugar and fat. That information travels toward the brain, where it can trigger a dopamine response that builds gradually and lasts for several minutes.

How the experiments worked

Knight and James Grove, then a graduate student, put nutrients directly into the stomachs of mice while tracking dopamine activity across their brains. The mice received either sugar water or a liquid resembling a milkshake. Bypassing the mouth let the team separate the effect of nutrients from the experience of tasting.

They saw a strong, prolonged dopamine response in a region called the anterior basolateral amygdala, or BLA. The amygdala is involved in emotional processing and in forming links between experiences and their consequences. Scientists already knew dopamine was released there, but its purpose was unclear.

The team then tested whether the signal changes behavior. When they interrupted the pathway, the mice kept eating normally but could no longer learn that an unfamiliar flavor was linked to calories. In the reverse experiment, mice tasted a flavor with no calories while the researchers artificially activated dopamine fibers in the BLA. The animals came to prefer that flavor anyway, even though it offered no nutritional reward.

Together, the results indicate that this dopamine system helps teach the brain which flavors predict a rewarding nutritional effect.

Signs of the same pattern in people

The researchers also looked for a similar process in humans, using data from collaborators. Dana Small, a psychologist at Yale University, reanalyzed an earlier positron emission tomography (PET) study of 13 men who had a milkshake or a drink without calories. She found that dopamine release after nutrient delivery was especially concentrated in the left side of the BLA.

A separate study led by Marc Tittgemeyer used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine 38 adults after they consumed glucose, a simple sugar. It showed increased activity in the same brain region.

One of the more unexpected findings was an imbalance between the brain's two halves. In both mice and humans, nutrients produced a noticeably stronger dopamine response in the left BLA than in the matching area on the right.

Why it matters for your morning cup

The finding offers a possible explanation for a familiar experience. Knight said that once the brain connects the taste of coffee with caffeine's stimulating effects, “that coffee starts to taste a lot better.”

The researchers say the discovery shows how the brain learns to crave certain foods and could eventually point to new ways of reshaping eating habits and food preferences.

What this means, and what it does not

It is worth being clear about the limits. The causal experiments, in which the pathway was blocked or switched on, were done in mice. The human data come from brain imaging that shows a similar pattern in a small number of participants: 13 men in one study and 38 adults in another. That points to a shared mechanism, but it does not show that people form food preferences in exactly the same way.

For now, the practical takeaway is not a change in what anyone should eat or drink. The study adds a mechanism to an everyday puzzle, and it gives researchers a specific brain circuit to study as they look for ways that food preferences are built and, perhaps one day, changed.

Read next
Mouse Study Splits Psilocybin's Brain Rewiring From Its Trip-Like Effects
Your Brain May Flicker Between What You See and Don't Notice 15 Times a Second
From Wright Wing-Warping to X-70: What NASA's New X-Plane Builds On

Around Prague, based on reporting by ScienceDaily